...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
This document is a work in progress. This dialog will be removed once the community agrees it is complete. |
Table of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
Summary
This use case allows clinics to make requests to a CHIS to follow-up for various reasons. A common implementation might be for Lost to Follow-Up whereby the clinic generates a list of patients that have missed appointments and wants community based systems to help find the patient and encourage them to attend their appointment or to understand why they cannot or will not. This might be achieved either by having a health worker physically go find the patient or by other communication protocols.
...
Based on the high level workflow mentioned above, the list of transactional indicators are below:
# | Description | Notes |
---|---|---|
1 | Count of ServiceRequests Created | |
2 | Count of ServiceRequests Claimed | |
3 | Count of ServiceRequests Completed | |
4 | Count of ServiceRequests Completed with Outcome of X | |
5 | Count of ServiceRequests Completed with Outcome of Y |
Key FHIR Resources
The essential resources for this workflow are as follows.
Description | Structure Definition | Samples |
---|---|---|
Patient | Patient.StructureDefinition.json | |
ServiceRequest | ServiceRequest.StructureDefinition.json | |
Encounter | Encounter.StructureDefinition.json |
Reference Architecture
The proof of concept uses the Instant OpenHIE architecture which utilizes a HAPI FHIR Server as a Shared Health Record component and OpenHIM for the Interoperability Layer. Detailed technical information and instructions for the CoPs shared infrastructure can be found here.
...