When: 09/18/2014 at 11:00 AM EDT

Where: Google Hangout  

Participants: 

Recorded Video:

Agenda:

The proposed agenda includes:   
  • Updates from the recent OHIE Architecture Meeting and how it pertains to the facility registry community (5 min)
  • Identification and prioritization of FR workflows to support.  A few to get us started as identified from implementers ... How can a FR consume code sets and hierarchy metadata from a trusted source?  How can a tool contribute updates to a FR?  What about more complex governance patterns for how facility registry data is managed? (~40 min)
  • Gauge interest for an "Implementers Call" to pair with this technical call (5 min) 
  • AOB? (Remaining time) 


Outcomes:

  • Reviewing the workflow process

    • Identify a need

    • Clarify sponsors and core actors

    • Depict as workflows

  • Identification and prioritization of FR workflows to support.  A few to get us started as identified from implementers ... How can a FR consume code sets and hierarchy metadata from a trusted source?  How can a tool contribute updates to a FR?  What about more complex governance patterns for how facility registry data is managed? (~40 min)

    • Codesets to a FR …. services, facility type, administrative hierarchy  (+++++

    • Patterns … Updates to a FR directly or from some existing source (++++

    • Updating the facility list in the data warehouse via a FR  (++

    • Can a Facility Registry consume Provider Data and vice Versa  (CSD?)  (+

Some others to consider:

  •  Alerts? (Sometimes FRs need to be an index)
  •  Survey Tool consumers a FR or vice versa


Scenarios of Data Use:















  • Gauge interest for an "Implementers Call" to pair with this technical call (5 min)

    • Would be of value

  • AOB? (Remaining time)






  • No labels