When: 10/02/2014 at 11:00 AM EDT
Where: Google Hangout
Participants: Larry, Roger, Knut, Niamh, Scott
Recorded Video:
Agenda:
- Identifying a first workflow and moving forward on drafting it together.
- Updates on the Facility Registry Implementer Call Moving Forward
- AOB as time allows (Some potential things include: Implementation updates, implementers guide, facility data to support the Ebola outbreak response, and whatever your burning issues are.)
Outcomes:
Goal for the Workflow #1:
User Stories: In TZ, There were many code sets managing different lists. Understanding core data elements and how they can improve roles and responsibilities.
Roger/Niamh: See some definition between a TS and code sets used in a FR? Push most in TS except many the hierarchical service may not be well capable. The initial limitation was -> Hierarchy operations and moving branches of trees that terminology servers are set up to do. Also, we haven't addressed the issue of multiple hierarchies … ( not sure if a TS could prevent data challenges)
User story: As a government user I want to redefine admin hierarchy level, as my country evolves, and have that reflected in my tools, to
User Story: Multiple hierarchies need to be managed,
Knut
Resonates well… often see that is a mess in most countries
There is no agreed to coding
User Story: Some actor(s) in a country is responsible for codeset/standards, I have no source of truth to manage code sets important to FRs
Especially a problem in countries where the script is not like english
User Story: Users localization and internationalization across languages and scripts
Code sets
Facilities
Tools??
WHO - SARA (Service Availability and Readiness Assessment)
Standard ones up on a TS
Can we help to take this and put it up as an input to requirements gathering that a country does.
Can we also use it in the context of supporting countries to define their requirements and where their overlaps is aligned with requirements
Map code sets
Between standards or between languages
Niamh
Integrating with DHIS and they have 1 way to categorize ownership and if that can be harmonized . If it is run by the
Larry
CSD -> Facility X … what are the services. Which providers are at that facility
This work flow could benefit: There would be a standardized way to define what services are there … instead of a hodgepodge of codings defined by the country. CSD Workflow?
Roger
Granularity of services: Is there a single list that everyone users? HIV services that are offered --- there is a standard list used in the US
Certified … for types of services … required for
Implementation question as there are different levels of details and uses.
Larry
Some of the other communities are saying that things have to go through the IL to get to the TS???
Developers vs. Architects vs. Project Managers vs.
A challenge in TZ … Not too enthusiastic about western led initiatives
HISP: Doesn’t do a lot of calls, relys on workshops and mailing list
Maybe a Conference Line